Florida Living for the Retired, Inc. v. Krauss

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• stating that the 2002 [J-12-2021] - 25 act “reconstituted the Board of Claims … and reposited ‘exclusive jurisdiction’ in that tribunal to arbitrate claims arising from contracts entered into by Commonwealth agencies in accordance with the Procurement Code”
• stating that the Code reaffirms sovereign immunity subject to “its explicit, limited waiver of such immunity ... in connection with a coordinate allocation of ‘exclusive jurisdiction’ to the Board ... over claims arising from certain contracts entered into by a Commonwealth agency”
• “The Legislature has deliberately excluded Section 521 cancellations from the scope of the right of protest. See 62 Pa. C.S. §1711.1(a
• “The Legislature has deliberately excluded Section 521 cancellations from the scope of the right of protest. See 62 Pa. C.S. §1711.1(a
• “The constitutionally-grounded, statutory doctrine of sovereign immunity obviously serves to protect government policymaking prerogatives and the public fisc.”
• “The constitutionally-grounded, statutory doctrine of sovereign immunity obviously serves to protect government policymaking prerogatives and the public fisc.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).