Florida Insurance Council, Inc. v. Office of Insurance Regulation

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• our Supreme Court has “construed broadly statutes providing for parental support of minor children”
• even an express preclusion of modification does not bar Court from modifying support order at the request of, and if in the best interests of, the minor children
• even an express preclusion of modification does not bar Court from modifying support order at the request of, and if in the best interests of, the minor children
• in enacting § 46b-86 [a], legislature did not intend to depart from common-law rule rendering contracts between parents regarding child support ineffective to limit children’s right to parental support
• minor child’s right to parental support has independent character, separate and apart from terms of support obligations as set out in judgment of dissolution, and court was without power to enter order that would permanently restrict unrepresented children’s rights
• minor child’s right to parental support has independent character, separate and apart from terms of support obligations as set out in judgment of dissolution, and court was without power to enter order that would permanently restrict unrepresented children’s rights

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).