Florida Ins. Guar. Ass'n v. Revoredo

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that an employee of a subcontractor is a “statutory employee” of the general contractor
• applying the exclusion when there should have been workers’ compensation coverage but the employer failed to secure it
• “Statutory employees have been treated identically to actual employees in relation to standard employee exclusion clauses.”
• “[T]he only coverage intended [in a CGL policy], and for which the premium has been paid, is the liability of the insured to the public, as distinguished from liability to the insured’s employees whether or not they are protected by the workers’ compensation law”
• applying standard employee exclusion provision

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).