Florida High School Athletic Ass'n v. Melbourne Central Catholic High School

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• recognizing that courts of equity do not have any right or power to issue such orders as they consider to be in the best interest of \social justice\ at the particular moment without regard to established law
• determining that participation in interscholastic sport activities, standing alone, was not constitutionally protected right
• “As a general rule, when a private organization has procedures for internal review of its decisions, those procedures must be exhausted before seeking redress from a court.”
• “When a method of appeal from an administrative ruling has been provided, such method must generally be followed to the exclusion of any other system of review.”
• “[T]he first principle of equity jurisdiction is that equity follows the law. Courts of equity simply have no power to issue rulings which they consider to be in the best interest of justice without regard to established law.” (internal quotations and citations omitted)

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).