Florida Farm Bureau Mut. Ins. Co. v. Gaskins

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• a case of negligent delivery of a wrong product as distinguished from delivery of a defective product
• where the negligent substitution of herbicide for insecticide occurred on premises of store, damages to third party's crops were covered by store owners premises-operations liability coverage
• product merely an instrumentality of the injury, and therefore not within products hazard provision of policy, where chemical supplier negligently supplied herbicide rather than insecticide to customer
• product hazard exclusion not applicable because herbicide “was merely the instrumentality through which the damage was done[;]’’ negligent delivery of wrong herbicide proximately caused the damage
• product merely an instrumentality of the injury, and therefore not within products hazard provision of policy, where chemical supplier negligently supplied herbicide rather than insecticide to customer
• coverage for crop damage resulting from misdelivery and use of herbicide rather than insecticide

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).