Florida Detroit Diesel v. Nathai

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• summarily affirming a workers’ compensation appeal that challenged a factual finding made by the JCC which was supported by competent substantial evidence
• “We have elected to review the order under the summary disposition procedure in rule 9.315(a
• \We conclude that the appellants' initial brief fails to demonstrate a preliminary basis for reversal and we therefore summarily affirm the order without the need for an answer brief.\
• “We conclude that the appellants' initial brief fails to demonstrate a preliminary basis for reversal and we therefore summarily affirm the order without the need for an answer brief.”
• “[W]e conclude that the appellants’ initial brief fails to demonstrate a preliminary basis for reversal and we therefore summarily affirm the order without the need for an answer brief.”
• \We conclude that the appellants' initial brief fails to demonstrate a preliminary basis for reversal and we therefore summarily affirm the order without the need for an answer brief.\

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).