Florida Desk, Inc. v. Mitchell Intern., Inc.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• finding that funds were not identifiable where they “were unsegregated and were placed in a general operating account”
• reversing judgment against the defendant on a civil theft claim under section 772.11 because the funds at issue “were unsegregated and were placed in a general operating account”
• “[T]here is no evidence that there was an obligation on [defendant’s] part to keep intact or hold a specific fund to deliver to [the plaintiff]”
• “[Tjhere is no evidence that there was any obligation on [the defendant’s] part to keep intact or hold a specific fund to deliver to [the plaintiff].”
• “To be a proper subject of conversion each coin or bill need not be earmarked, but there must be an obligation to keep intact or deliver the specific money in question, so that such money can be identified.”
• re- jecting a civil-theft claim because “the funds received . . . were un- segregated and were placed in a general operating account” and because there was no “obligation . . . to keep intact or hold a spe- cific fund to deliver to Florida Desk”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).