Florida Dept. of Revenue v. Diaz

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• concluding that “the discharge injunction prohibits 13 collection only with respect to dischargeable debts and does not 14 apply to nondischargeable debts”
• concluding that “the discharge injunction prohibits collection only with respect to dischargeable debts and does not apply to nondischargeable debts”
• concluding that “[f]ederal bankruptcy courts have no business becoming embroiled in state domestic relations to such a degree” as to “result in de facto modification of state child-support orders”
• explaining that the bankruptcy court’s order sustaining the claim objection and reducing the allowed claim was not an adjudication of the total amount of the debt
• holding post-petition interest on child support obligation is nondischargeable in chapter 13
• noting that, at the time of the claim objection, the only issue “was the amount of . . . debt that would be paid by the bankruptcy estate through [the plan], not the total amount of the . . . debt”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).