Florida Cable Television Ass'n v. Deason

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• agency's interpretation of statute it is charged with enforcing is entitled to great deference

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

11 cases in this archive cite this case.

• BellSouth Telecommunications, Inc. v. Johnson
  Supreme Court of Florida· 1998-04-09· cited 29×
• Skf Management v. Unemployment Appeals
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 1995-12-15· cited 11×
• FL. INTEREXCHANGE CARRIERS v. Clark
  Supreme Court of Florida· 1996-08-22· cited 10×
• Metropolitan Dade Cty. v. PJ BIRDS
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 1995-05-05· cited 7×
• Florida Cities Water Co. v. State
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 1998-01-12· cited 7×
• Childers v. Department of Environmental Protection
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 1997-07-16· cited 3×
• Childers v. DEPT. OF ENVIRON. PROTECTION
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 1997-07-16· cited 2×
• Leon County v. State Dept. of Community Affairs
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 1996-01-23· cited 1×
• US LEC of Tennessee, Inc. v. Tennessee Regulatory Authority
  Court of Appeals of Tennessee· 2006-04-17
• Ago
  Florida Attorney General Reports· 1996-01-11
• ACP Holdings, Inc. v. Metropolitan Dade County
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 1999-06-02

Cites

5 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

• Forsythe v. Longboat Key Beach Erosion
  Supreme Court of Florida· 1992-06-25· cited 294×
• PW Ventures, Inc. v. Nichols
  Supreme Court of Florida· 1988-10-27· cited 74×
• General Telephone Company of Florida v. Carter
  Supreme Court of Florida· 1959-11-13· cited 44×
• United Telephone Co. v. Public Service Com'n
  Supreme Court of Florida· 1986-07-17· cited 18×
• Fort Pierce Utilities Authority v. Beard
  Supreme Court of Florida· 1993-11-18· cited 10×