Florida Bar v. Fortunato

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• stating that the finding that an attorney presented false, confusing, and deliberately misleading testimony at the disciplinary hearing was a “significant” aggravating factor and that such a finding does not have to be explicitly labeled as such by the referee to be considered
• stating that the finding that an attorney presented false, confusing, and deliberately misleading testimony at the disciplinary hearing was a “significant” aggravating factor and that such a finding does not have to be explicitly labeled as such by the referee to be considered

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

4 cases in this archive cite this case.

• The Florida Bar v. Batista
  Supreme Court of Florida· 2003-04-17· cited 15×
• Florida Bar v. Head
  Supreme Court of Florida· 2012-03-15· cited 6×
• The Florida Bar v. Rita Horwitz Altman
  Supreme Court of Florida· 2020-05-07
• The Florida Bar v. Rita Horwitz Altman
  Supreme Court of Florida· 2020-05-14

Cites

5 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

• The Florida Bar v. Cibula
  Supreme Court of Florida· 1998-11-25· cited 14×
• The Florida Bar v. Segal
  Supreme Court of Florida· 1995-11-22· cited 11×
• The Florida Bar v. Williams
  Supreme Court of Florida· 1992-06-25· cited 7×
• The Florida Bar v. Weisser
  Supreme Court of Florida· 1998-05-14· cited 7×
• Florida Bar v. Arango
  Supreme Court of Florida· 1998-11-05· cited 1×