Skip to main content
· 1/3/2005

Floriberto Eudoxio Gomez-Lopez v. John Ashcroft, Attorney General

Citations

  • 393 F.3d 882
  • 2005 U.S. App. LEXIS 12
  • 2005 WL 14810

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • noting that judicial review is precluded \with respect to decisions that constitute an exercise of the Attorney General's discretion.\
  • noting that judicial review is precluded “with respect to decisions that constitute an exercise of the Attorney General’s discretion.”
  • noting that judicial review is precluded with respect to decisions that constitute an exercise of discretion
  • noting 8 U.S.C. § 1252(a)(2)(B)® precludes judicial review of discretionary decisions denying cancellation of removal
  • Judicial review is precluded “with respect to decisions that constitute an exercise of the Attorney General’s discretion.”
  • incarceration in a California county jail constituted confinement to a penal institution for purposes of 8 U.S.C. § 1101(f)(7)

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Tashima, Fisher, Tallman

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.