Skip to main content
· 10/10/2002

Floret, L.L.C. v. Sendecky (In Re Sendecky)

Citations

  • 283 B.R. 760
  • 2002 Bankr. LEXIS 1129
  • 40 Bankr. Ct. Dec. (CRR) 74
  • 2002 WL 31259944

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • finding that the debt- or was justified in not maintaining records for his small business because he was poorly educated, unsophisticated and had little business experience
  • upholding bankruptcy court’s finding that evidence of debtor’s fraudulent intent was overcome by evidence that he had relied on the advice of an attorney, and that the advice was not unreasonable or uninformed
  • no clear error as to bankruptcy court's finding that debtor’s lack of education, sophistication, and business experience explained his inadequate business records
  • “If a party demonstrates a deficiency of assets, the burden shifts to the debtor to explain the loss.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Roger, Schermer, Federman

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.