Skip to main content
· 8/17/2016

Florestal v. Coleman-Florestal

Citations

  • 142 A.D.3d 580
  • 36 N.Y.S.3d 684

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • holding issues not raised in claimant’s appeal to Board are waived for purposes of appellate review
  • holding issues not raised in claimant’s appeal to Board are waived for purposes of appellate review
  • stating that petitioner’s failure to raise an issue before the Board impairs this Court’s ability to review the Board’s decision with respect to that issue, and, consequently, the issue is waived
  • finding a claimant waived an issue because the claimant did not address the issue before the Board
  • “The failure of Claimant to raise the issue with the [UCBR] impairs our ability to review the [UCBR]’s decision with respect to that issue. Consequently, the issue was waived.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Leventhal, Hall, Austin, Barros

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.