· 8/17/2016
Florestal v. Coleman-Florestal
Citations
- 142 A.D.3d 580
- 36 N.Y.S.3d 684
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- holding issues not raised in claimant’s appeal to Board are waived for purposes of appellate review
- holding issues not raised in claimant’s appeal to Board are waived for purposes of appellate review
- stating that petitioner’s failure to raise an issue before the Board impairs this Court’s ability to review the Board’s decision with respect to that issue, and, consequently, the issue is waived
- finding a claimant waived an issue because the claimant did not address the issue before the Board
- “The failure of Claimant to raise the issue with the [UCBR] impairs our ability to review the [UCBR]’s decision with respect to that issue. Consequently, the issue was waived.”
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Leventhal, Hall, Austin, Barros
Read full opinion on CourtListenerSourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.