Skip to main content

Flores v. State

Citations

  • 662 So. 2d 1350
  • 1995 WL 681745

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • noting that it is difficult without the benefit of an eviden-tiary hearing to determine whether or why defense counsel would have failed to explore a particular defense
  • disapproving of growing practice of incorporating state responses into orders denying postconviction motions as substitute for record attachments
  • disapproving practice of incorporating state responses into orders denying postconviction motions as substitute for record attachments

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Per Curiam

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

22 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Cites

4 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.