Flores v. Shapiro & Kreisman

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• noting that maintaining the pre-1996 pleading requirements would render the words “or deceptive conduct” redundant and superfluous
• “[B]y adding a prohibition on ‘deceptive’ conduct, the 1996 amendment to the [UTPCPL] (continued…

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).