Skip to main content
C.D. California· 1/25/2008

Flores v. Hickman

Citations

  • 533 F. Supp. 2d 1068
  • 2008 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 12218
  • 2008 WL 342748

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • trial court’s imposition of 14 restitution not cognizable on habeas review under Section 2254 because restitution 15 order does not affect duration of custody

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Ronald S.W. Lew

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.