Flores v. Department of Transportation

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that the autopsy report was testimonial hearsay
• holding that the autopsy report was testimonial hearsay
• \a judge may not remove the issue of a biased or faulty police investigation from the jury\
• witness testified about factual findings contained in an autopsy report authored by the medical examiner who performed the autopsy
• prior consistent statements of “critical witness” not prejudicial where “independently obtained evidence presented at trial . . . offered repeated corroboration of the chronology of events that [he] laid out”
• although not dispositive, cumulative nature of prior consistent testimony indicates lack of prejudice

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).