Flores v. Crescent Beach Club, LLC

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• noting that “a charging creditor does not become a full partner, [and] is not entitled to manage the partnership”
• finding that “the remedy provisions of the UPA are available to judgment creditors under the ULPA”
• finding that where only the UPA, and not the ULPA, provides means of enforcing a charging order, the charging order provision of the ULPA “relies on rather than conflicts with” the UPA provision
• noting, in the context of a limited partnership, that a charging order is not an assignment and the charging creditor does not become a full partner and is not entitled to manage the partnership
• charging order provision of Uniform Partnership Act supplements Uniform Limited Partnership Act
• reference in Connecticut’s version of Uniform Partnership Act to remedy of foreclosure without designation as to mode of foreclosure was intended as a reference to either mode of foreclosure

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).