Skip to main content

Florence v. State

Citations

  • 755 So. 2d 1065
  • 2000 WL 146850

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • finding that sexually explicit homosexual magazines and videotapes were admissible in a sexual battery case when the defendant had “opened the door” to such evidence by denying that he was a homosexual
  • defense \opened the door\ and put the question of Florence's potential homosexuality before the jury
  • Defense “opened the door”, and therefore, put the question of Florence’s potential homosexuality before the jury.
  • defense “opened the door” and put the question of Florence’s potential homosexuality before the jury
  • defendant's attorney opened the door during opening statements by denying any homosexual tendencies and the introduction of extrinsic evidence to rebut those statements was held as relevant and not unfairly prejudicial

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Sullivan, P.J., Smith and Mills

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

13 cases in this archive cite this case.

Cites

10 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.