Skip to main content
· 3/23/2009

Florence v. Stanback

Citations

  • 607 F. Supp. 2d 1119
  • 2009 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 49702
  • 2009 WL 928487

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • noting that magistrate judge did not need to issue findings and recommendations on a motion to dismiss 26 where the order denied the motion to dismiss without prejudice
  • district court judge held that the assigned magistrate judge did not exceed jurisdiction by denying a motion to dismiss without prejudice to the defendants’ ability to raise the same issues in another motion
  • district court judge held that the assigned magistrate judge did not exceed jurisdiction by denying a motion to dismiss without prejudice to the defendants’ ability to raise the same issues in another motion
  • Even if “the Magistrate Judge entered an order purporting to determine a dispositive matter, the Court has the authority to ignore the form of the decision and treat it as a Report and Recommendation.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Ronald S.W. Lew

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.