Floray v. Dargan Extensions, LLC

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• “Although our legislature has authorized antenuptial agreements, it has made no such allowance for postnuptial agreements.”
• “The court should grant a party’s motion for judgment on the pleadings only if the uncontroverted facts stated in the pleadings, taken alone, entitle a party to judgment.”
• “[O]ver a century ago, we held that ‘a contract between husband and wife, with reference to her interest in his estate, is of no validity whatever’” and “we have presumed here that Iowa does not enforce postnuptial agreements that waive a spouse’s elective share.”
• applying choice-of-law principles to an elective-share question

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).