Skip to main content
· 6/23/1994

Flora M. SULLINS, Appellant, v. Donna E. SHALALA, Secretary of the Department of Health and Human Services, Appellee

Citations

  • 25 F.3d 601

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • finding that subjective complaints of pain may be “discounted if there are inconsistencies in the evidence as a whole”
  • finding that subjective complaints of pain may be “discounted if there are inconsistencies in the evidence as a whole”
  • finding it “noteworthy that [the claimant] did not allege a disabling mental impairment in her application for disability benefits, nor did she offer such an impairment as a basis for disability at her hearing”
  • ALJ ordinarily has no obligation to investigate claims not presented at time of application or not offered at hearing

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Fagg, Heaney, Loken

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.