Flora Holmes v. Merrick B. Garland

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• stating that the court’s authority is to affirm, reverse, modify, or remand to the trial court
• “A trial court’s findings of fact satisfy Arizona law if they are ‘pertinent to the issues and comprehensive enough to provide a basis for the decision.’”
• “Where possible, when a trial court in a non-jury case fails to make or makes insufficient findings of fact and conclusions of law, a reviewing court should remand the case to the trial court for further findings.”
• “[W]hen a trial court in a non-jury case fails to make or makes insufficient findings of fact and conclusions of law, a reviewing court should remand 3 DAVIS, et al. v. STATE Decision of the Court the case to the trial court for further findings.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).