Flor v. Holguin

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• stating that the remedial purpose of the system is to “provide compensation for an employee for all work-connected injuries, regardless of questions of negligence and proximate cause” (internal quotation marks and citations omitted)
• requiring, inter alia, that the injury-by-disease be “caused by conditions that are characteristic of or peculiar to the particular trade, occupation, or employment” (emphasis added)
• discussing the date of injury in the context of an occupational disease
• “[The Workers’ Compensation Laws’] paramount purpose is to provide compensa tion to an employee for all work-related inju-ríese.]”
• section 386-85(1) mandated presumption that complainant's \injury by disease\ is compensable work-connected injury
• section 386-85(1) mandated presumption that complainant's “injury by disease” is compensable work-connected injury

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).