Floorgraphics, Inc. v. News America Marketing In-Store Services, Inc.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• rejecting challenge to an expert’s testimony “based on the possibility that the underlying data could be altered” where there was “not a shred of evidence to indicate the files were in any way manipulated”
• rejecting challenge to an expert’s testimony “based on the possibility that the underlying data could be altered” where there was “not a shred of evidence to indicate the files were in any way manipulated”
• “[A]n expert opining on a general matter is not required to have experience that is narrowly tailored to the specific industry in question.”
• “[A]n expert opining on a general matter is not required to have experience that is narrowly tailored to the specific industry in question.”
• “Whether [the expert] should have more diligently researched the underlying facts given to him by Plaintiff, in the Court’s view, is a question of weight, not admissibility.”
• “[T]he trial court’s role as gatekeeper is not intended to serve as a replacement for the adversary system.” (quoting United States v. 14.38 Acres of Land, More or Less Situated in Leflore Cnty., State of Miss., 80 F.3d 1074, 1078 (Sth Cir. 1996))

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).