Flohr v. Coleman

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• reasoning that the opinions of courts are not addressed to juries and are not always appropriate for use in instructions to them
• finding that trial judge properly “pointed out the particular duty of a driver, blinded by the lights of an approaching vehicle, to slow down to avoid hitting a pedestrian who might be on the highway”
• \The reasoning of courts in opinions is not addressed to juries and is not always adapt[able] to use in instructions to them\
• “The reasoning of courts in opinions is not addressed to juries and is not always adaptable] to use in instructions to them”
• motorist is presumed to know the law regulating the use of motor vehicles

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).