Flint v. Wells

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that agency action was arbitrary and capricious where the agency \only consider[ed] one side of the equation\ in its cost-benefit analysis
• finding that the agency's failure to provide a reasoned explanation for its decision to suspend a rule based on the rule's costs, while ignoring its benefits, violated the APA
• delaying the compliance date for regulations without complying with APA procedures to issue such a delay was a \serious\ error, not a \minor procedural mistake[ ]\
• rejecting stay where the agency \merely paid *lip service' to the pending judicial review\
• \Without considering both the costs and the benefits of\ a deregulatory action, an agency \fail[s] to take [an] 'important aspect' of the problem into account.\
• Section 705 stays that \failed to consider the benefits of the\ stayed rule must be vacated

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).