Flint v. Dennison

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that injunctive relief expunging disciplinary information from university records “cannot be characterized solely as retroactive injunctive relief and [is] not barred by the Eleventh Amendment”
• holding that expungement of a school 7 disciplinary record is prospective injunctive relief
• finding that negative entries in a student’s university records presented a continuing violation sufficient to overcome Eleventh Amendment immunity
• noting that 17 injunctive relief in Ex parte Young suits “serve the purpose of preventing present and future 18 harm” to the plaintiff
• holding the Eleventh Amendment bars damages actions against government officials in 2 their official capacity
• stating that correction of university records “serve[s] the purpose of preventing present and future harm”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).