Flint v. Boston Woven Hose & Rubber Co.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• acknowledging that a panel need not reach the performance prong if an IAC claim may be disposed of on prejudice
• acknowledging that before the Supreme Court’s decision in 16 Shinn v. Ramirez, 596 U.S. 366, 379 (2022), a claim previously presented to a state court could 17 become a new unexhausted (and procedurally defaulted
• “[N]either the Supreme Court nor the Ninth Circuit has ever held that the duration of a death row inmate’s confinement prior to execution amounts to cruel and unusual punishment.” (citing Smith v. Mahoney, 611 F.3d 978, 998 (9th Cir. 2010))
• reciting procedural background to those claims

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).