Skip to main content
· 10/4/1976

Flint Ridge Development Co. v. Scenic Rivers Assn. of Okla.

Citations

  • 426 U.S. 776
  • 96 S. Ct. 2430
  • 49 L. Ed. 2d 205
  • 1976 U.S. LEXIS 107

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • holding that the Interstate Land Sales Full Disclosure Act, 15 U.S.C. § 1701, displaces NEPA where they are in direct conflict
  • holding that NEPA does not apply because Secretary of Housing had an obligation to allow real estate records to go into effect 30 days after filing
  • holding that NEPA does not apply because Secretary of Housing had an obligation to allow real estate records to go into effect 30 days after filing
  • noting that 1975 data indicated that an EIS on a simple project may take up to five months to complete and an EIS on a \[c]omplex projects prepared by inexperienced personnel may take up to 18 months to prepare\
  • noting that 1975 data indicated that an EIS on a simple project may take up to five months to complete and an EIS on a “[c]omplex projects prepared by inexperienced personnel may take up to 18 months to prepare”
  • HUD’s performance of mandatory duty of approval and registration of statement of record and property report did not require EIS

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: MaRshall, Marshall, Members, Powell

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.