Fliegel v. Davis

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• the plaintiffs action was not time barred because there was no evidence that the plaintiff could have known that its attorneys’ advice was negligent

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

9 cases in this archive cite this case.

• Hennekens v. Hoerl
  Wisconsin Supreme Court· 1991-02-20· cited 86×
• Sizemore v. Swift
  Court of Appeals of Oregon· 1986-05-14· cited 17×
• Godfrey v. Bick & Monte, P.C.
  Court of Appeals of Oregon· 1986-01-29· cited 17×
• Ranier v. Stuart and Freida, PC
  Court of Civil Appeals of Oklahoma· 1994-11-08· cited 9×
• Magnuson v. Lake
  Court of Appeals of Oregon· 1986-04-16· cited 9×
• Guirma v. O'Brien
  Court of Appeals of Oregon· 2013-12-11· cited 7×
• Knight v. Rew
  Court of Appeals of Oregon· 1986-06-04· cited 2×
• Timber By-Products, Inc. v. Sloan
  Court of Appeals of Oregon· 1997-06-11· cited 1×
• Cutrell v. Holbrook
  Court of Appeals of Oregon· 1995-06-28

Cites

5 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

• United States National Bank of Oregon v. Davies
  Oregon Supreme Court· 1976-04-15· cited 128×
• Jaquith v. Ferris
  Oregon Supreme Court· 1984-09-18· cited 35×
• St. Paul Fire & Marine Insurance v. Speerstra
  Court of Appeals of Oregon· 1983-06-22· cited 28×
• Lincoln Construction, Inc. v. Thomas J. Parker & Associates, Inc.
  Oregon Supreme Court· 1980-09-30· cited 11×
• Lincoln Construction, Inc. v. Thomas J. Parker & Associates, Inc.
  Court of Appeals of Oregon· 1979-11-13· cited 2×