Flickinger v. Huber

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• in a case under the Disease Act, mere proof that silica dust existed at plant not sufficient to prove that silicosis is a hazard in industry or occupation or in particular factory
• evidence that clay with which the claimant worked possessed a proportion of free silica of 30% to 40% is sufficient to support a finding that dust from the clay posed a silica hazard

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).