Skip to main content

Flick v. Stewart-Warner Corp.

Citations

  • 76 N.Y.2d 50
  • 555 N.E.2d 907
  • 556 N.Y.S.2d 510
  • 1990 N.Y. LEXIS 1066

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • explaining that statutory requirements for service of process “are not mere procedural technicalities but measures designed to satisfy due process requirements of actual notice”
  • explaining the requisite procedure and holding that “strict compliance with the procedures of Business Corporation Law § 307 is required to effect service on an unauthorized foreign corporation”
  • in addressing identical language contained in § 307, stating that “[s]ueh process must be served personally at the office of the Secretary of State in Albany”
  • in addressing identical language contained in § 307, stating that “[s]ueh process must be served personally at the office of the Secretary of State in Albany”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Hancock

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

36 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Cites

8 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

Other cases named Flick v. Stewart-Warner Corp.

1 other CourtListener record shares this case name.

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.