Flick v. PMA Ins. Co.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• noting that claim in Rothfuss arose “when the [insurance] carrier failed to provide medical benefits that its own physician had deemed necessary”
• dismissing plaintiffs action in Superior Court because “plaintiff has failed to exhaust administrative remedies available to him before the judge of compensation”
• “The doctrine of exhaustion is sensibly designed to allow administrative bodies to perform their statutory functions in an orderly manner without preliminary interference from the courts.” (citation and internal quotation marks omitted)

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).