Flexible Manufacturing Systems Pty. Ltd. v. Super Products Corporation

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• imposing Rule 38 sanctions because the “appeal had absolutely no prospect of success and has served only to tax the resources of this Court ... costing the appellant] more than two years of delay in collecting its arbitration award”
• “‘[fjaetual or legal errors by arbitrators — even gross or clear errors' — do not authorize courts to annul awards.’ ”
• “ ‘Thinly veiled attempts to obtain appellate review of an arbitrator’s decision’ ... are not permitted under the FAA.’ ”
• “Thinly veiled attempts to obtain appellate review of an arbitrator’s decision . . . are not permitted under the FAA. Factual or legal errors by arbitrators—even clear or gross errors—do not authorize courts to annul awards.”
• “The fact that an arbitrator makes a mistake, by erroneously rejecting a valid, or even a dispositive legal defense, does not provide grounds for vacating an award unless the arbitrator deliberately disregarded what she knew to be the law.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).