Fleury v. Biomet, Inc.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that where the spoliation was inadvertent and resulted in no prejudice, there was no basis for sanctions
• finding no basis for spoliation sanctions when neither party was at fault for the spoliation and the “the defendants were not prejudiced by the spoliation”
• first citing Harrell v. Mayberry, 754 So.2d 742, 745 (Fla. 2d DCA 2000); then citing Sponco Mfg., Inc. v. Alcover, 656 So.2d 629, 630 (Fla. 3d DCA 1995)
• reversing summary judgment and remanding for further proceedings

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).