Skip to main content
· 5/6/2008

Fletcher v. United States Parole Commission

Citations

  • 550 F. Supp. 2d 30
  • 2008 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 36402

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • “A case is considered moot either when the issues presented are no longer ‘live’ or the parties lack a legally cognizable interest in the outcome.”
  • “A case is considered moot either when the issues presented are no longer ‘live’ or the parties lack a legally cognizable interest in the outcome.”
  • “A case is considered moot either when the issues presented are no longer ‘live’ or the parties lack a legally cognizable interest in the outcome.”
  • “This Circuit has expressly held that absolute immunity shields agency officials from a Bivens action that is based on the promulgation of unconstitutional regulations.”
  • “A case is considered moot either 1 The USPC assumed authority over parole determinations of District of Columbia prisoners in August 1998. See Franklin v. District of Columbia, 163 F.3d 625, 632 (D.C. Cir. 1998

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: John D. Bates

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.