Fletcher v. Dyal

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• \we reject the State's position that the adjudicated offense for which disposition is being modified may serve as one of the `previous' adjudications required under section 54.05[k].\
• \We respectfully disagree with [Professor Dawson's] interpretation of the statute because it is contrary to the statute's plain meaning.\
• “we reject the State’s position that the adjudicated offense for which disposition is being modified may serve as one of the ‘previous’ adjudications required under section 54.05[k].”
• “We respectfully disagree with [Professor Dawson’s] interpretation of the statute because it is contrary to the statute’s plain meaning.”
• \we reject the State's position that the adjudicated offense for which disposition is being modified may serve as one of the 'previous' adjudications required under section 54.05[k].\
• “we reject the State’s position that the adjudicated offense for which disposition is being modified may serve as one of the ‘previous’ adjudications required under section 54.05[k].”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).