Flentje v. First Nat. Bank of Wynne

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• explaining that Flenlje’s own perception of her supervisor’s actions, without a supporting affidavit or other form of proof, was insufficient to support a reasonable inference of discriminatory intent
• explaining that the respondent bears the burden of meeting proof with proof
• “When the movant makes a prima facie showing . . . , the respondent must discard the shielding cloak of formal allegations and meet proof with proof . . . .”
• “When the movant makes a prima facie showing of entitlement to a summary judgment, the respondent must discard the shielding cloak of formal allegations and meet proof with proof by showing a genuine issue as to a material fact.”
• “When the movant makes a prima facie showing of entitlement to summary judgment, the respondent must discard the shielding cloak of formal allegations and meet proof with proof by showing a genuine issue as to a material fact.”’
• applying federal Title VII analysis and cases to ACRA claim

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).