Skip to main content
· 11/6/1998

Flenker v. Willamette Industries, Inc.

Citations

  • 967 P.2d 295
  • 266 Kan. 198
  • 1999 CCH OSHD 31,870
  • 14 I.E.R. Cas. (BNA) 913
  • 1998 Kan. LEXIS 671

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • holding that Occupational Health & Safety Act, which does not provide a private right of action, does not preclude judicial recognition of a state claim for wrongful discharge in violation of public policy
  • considering OSHA violations for machine safety and holding that plaintiff could maintain a state-law tort claim for retaliatory discharge because the federal OSHA remedy was inadequate
  • whistleblowing claim based on good-faith reporting of federal Occupational Safety and Health Act violations approved
  • whistleblowing based on good-faith reporting of federal Occupational Safety and Health Act violations
  • responding to certified question from the 10th Circuit Court of Appeals after defendant filed motion for summary judgment in federal court case alleging Occupational Safety & Health Administration provided an adequate alternative remedy for plaintiffs common-law retaliatory discharge claim
  • alternative remedies doctrine, referenced sometimes as preclusion, and which is a substitution of law concept, is applied to OSHA remedy and retaliatory discharge

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Six

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.