Flemming v. Ronson Corp.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• explaining that an idea may be new to the plaintiff without being novel
• stating in connection with misappropriation of confidential submission claim that novelty element was more important for its evidentiary value in establishing defendant's use of plaintiff's idea than for its substantive quality
• misappropriation of an idea sounds in quasi-contract

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).