Fleming v. State

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• “The offense of first-degree receiving stolen property is not 13 encompassed within the offense of first-degree theft charged in the indictment. They are separate and distinct offenses.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

7 cases in this archive cite this case.

• United States v. Aguila-Montes De Oca
  Ninth Circuit· 2011-08-11· cited 187×
• Ex Parte Cole
  Supreme Court of Alabama· 2002-03-15· cited 74×
• Toliver v. State
  Court of Criminal Appeals of Alabama· 2003-06-27· cited 26×
• Ex Parte State
  Supreme Court of Alabama· 2004-12-10· cited 16×
• Wingard v. State
  Court of Criminal Appeals of Alabama· 2001-11-30· cited 15×
• McMillian v. State
  Court of Criminal Appeals of Alabama· 2005-01-28· cited 2×
• State of Iowa v. James Paul Vandermark
  Supreme Court of Iowa· 2021-10-22

Cites

7 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

• Ross v. State
  Court of Criminal Appeals of Alabama· 1988-06-28· cited 91×
• Ford v. State
  Court of Criminal Appeals of Alabama· 1992-09-30· cited 29×
• Green v. State
  Court of Criminal Appeals of Alabama· 1993-05-07· cited 23×
• Ex Parte Howard
  Supreme Court of Alabama· 1997-10-31· cited 21×
• Howard v. State
  Court of Criminal Appeals of Alabama· 1996-09-27· cited 18×
• Glover v. State
  Court of Criminal Appeals of Alabama· 1994-09-09· cited 17×
• White v. State
  Court of Criminal Appeals of Alabama· 1980-02-26· cited 11×