Fleming v. State

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• “The purpose behind the requirement of corroboration is to protect an accused from being falsely implicated by another criminal in the hope of clemency, a desire for revenge, or for any other reason.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

5 cases in this archive cite this case.

• Carmell v. Texas
  Supreme Court· 2000-05-01· cited 525×
• Tibbs v. State
  Court of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma· 1991-10-24· cited 70×
• Glossip v. State
  Court of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma· 2007-04-13· cited 68×
• Bowie v. State
  Court of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma· 1995-01-12· cited 18×
• METOYER v. STATE
  Court of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma· 2022-10-20· cited 6×

Cites

10 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

• Gillespie v. State
  Court of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma· 1960-09-07· cited 39×
• Luckey v. State
  Court of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma· 1974-12-11· cited 33×
• Howard v. State
  Court of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma· 1977-03-04· cited 27×
• Pierce v. State
  Court of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma· 1982-09-21· cited 23×
• Howell v. State
  Court of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma· 1981-07-21· cited 12×
• C.R.B. v. State
  Court of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma· 1982-01-04· cited 7×
• Kitchens v. State
  Court of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma· 1978-03-27· cited 3×
• May v. State
  Court of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma· 1975-02-19· cited 3×
• Netter v. State
  Court of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma· 1982-05-25· cited 2×
• Grider v. State
  Court of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma· 1982-12-14· cited 2×