M.D. Alabama· 3/29/2005
Fleming v. Dowdell
Citations
- 434 F. Supp. 2d 1138
- 2005 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 42265
- 2005 WL 4053821
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- finding dismissal of the Fourth Amendment claim was proper because “[a] complaint may not be amended by briefs in opposition to a motion to dismiss or motion for summary judgment”
- finding dismissal of a Fourth Amendment claim was proper because “[a] complaint may not be amended by briefs in opposition to a motion to dismiss or motion for summary judgment”
- “A complaint may not be amended by briefs in opposition to a motion to dismiss or motion for summary judgment which, in effect, is what [the plaintiff] has attempted to 2 do.”
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Ira Dement
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
5 cases in this archive cite this case.
- Gibbons v. McBrideS.D. Georgia· 2015-08-21· cited 33×
- McKally v. PerezS.D. Florida· 2015-02-06· cited 10×
- Equal Employment Opportunity Commission v. Labor Solutions of Al LLCN.D. Alabama· 2017-03-17· cited 7×
- Holley v. Town of Camp HillM.D. Alabama· 2018-10-29· cited 2×
- Greenwood Bible Deliverance Church, Inc. v. ArdCourt of Civil Appeals of Alabama· 2016-10-21
Cites
97 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.
- Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court· 1986-06-25· cited 135,235×
- Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court· 1986-06-25· cited 119,442×
- Matsushita Electric Industrial Co., Ltd. v. Zenith Radio CorporationSupreme Court· 1986-03-26· cited 58,760×
- Farmer v. BrennanSupreme Court· 1994-06-06· cited 28,443×
- Estelle v. GambleSupreme Court· 1976-11-30· cited 28,035×
- Harlow v. FitzgeraldSupreme Court· 1982-06-24· cited 22,846×
- Adickes v. S. H. Kress & Co.Supreme Court· 1970-06-01· cited 15,427×
- City of Canton v. HarrisSupreme Court· 1989-02-28· cited 10,043×
- Franks v. DelawareSupreme Court· 1978-06-26· cited 8,679×
- Paul W. Douglass v. United Services Automobile AssociationFifth Circuit· 1996-03-28· cited 8,052×
- Daniels v. WilliamsSupreme Court· 1986-01-21· cited 7,676×
- Imbler v. PachtmanSupreme Court· 1976-03-02· cited 7,274×
- Albright v. OliverSupreme Court· 1994-01-24· cited 7,028×
- Baker v. McCollanSupreme Court· 1979-06-26· cited 5,659×
- Stump v. SparkmanSupreme Court· 1978-06-05· cited 5,547×
- Hope v. PelzerSupreme Court· 2002-06-27· cited 4,957×
- Pierson v. RaySupreme Court· 1967-04-11· cited 4,282×
- City of St. Louis v. PraprotnikSupreme Court· 1988-03-02· cited 3,553×
- Buckley v. FitzsimmonsSupreme Court· 1993-06-24· cited 2,450×
- City of Newport v. Fact Concerts, Inc.Supreme Court· 1981-06-26· cited 2,156×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.