Fleming v. Court of Appeals of New York

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that the plaintiffs claims were frivolous because “she has no proof or evidence of the defendant’s alleged conduct”
• dismissing pro se complaint sua sponte where the complaint made clear that there was “[un]disputedly no factual and legal basis for the asserted wrong”
• courts may act sua sponte when the complaint “indisputedly” contains “no . . . legal basis for the asserted wrong”
• courts may act sua sponte when the complaint “indisputedly” contains “no factual and legal basis for the asserted wrong”
• courts may act sua sponte when the complaint “indisputedly” contains “no factual and legal basis for the asserted wrong”
• courts may act sua sponte when the complaint “indisputedly” contains “no factual and legal basis for the asserted wrong”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).