· 3/14/1984

Fleming v. Caras

Citations

317 S.E.2d 600
170 Ga. App. 579
39 U.C.C. Rep. Serv. (West) 211
1984 Ga. App. LEXIS 1954

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

reversing dismissal because the plaintiff was “entitled to an indorsement” under the predecessor of U.C.C. § 3-203(c)
trial court correctly exercised its discretion in considering whether action on promissory notes had been brought by real party in interest as required by OCGA § 9-11-17 (a)

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Pope, Quillian, Sognier

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.