Fleitz v. Van Westrienen

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that Rule 36 admissions \fall within the category of judicial admissions which preclude attempts to dispute the admitted fact or to submit evidence to disprove them\
• holding that Rule 36 admissions \fall within the category of judicial admissions which preclude attempts to dispute the admitted fact or to submit evidence to disprove them\
• \The only evidence regarding her lost time was Mrs. Fleitz's testimony that she had missed 'about six or seven working weeks' since the accident but could not state when.\
• once defendant met “burden of coming forward with evidence” showing it “made an offer of 35 judgment greater than the verdict,” “the burden shifted to [plaintiff] to show the . . . offer was in fact for something less”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).