Fleischer v. Astrue

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• reasoning that the ALJ’s reasoning must “build an accurate and logical bridge between the evidence and the result” (internal quotation marks omitted)
• noting that an ALJ must “build an accurate and logical bridge between the evidence and the result.”
• stating that, if a medical source’s opinion contradicts the ALJ’s RFC finding, the ALJ must explain why he did not include the limitation in his RFC determination
• stating that, if a medical source’s opinion contradicts the ALJ’s RFC finding, the ALJ must explain why he did not include the limitation in his RFC determination
• stating that, if a medical source’s opinion contradicts the ALJ’s RFC finding, the ALJ must explain why he did not include the limitation in his RFC determination
• stating that, if a medical source’s opinion contradicts the ALJ’s RFC finding, the ALJ must explain why he did not include the limitation in his RFC determination

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).