Skip to main content
· 4/8/2024

FLEIG v. LANDMARK CONSTRUCTION GROUP

Citations

  • 549 P.3d 1208
  • 2024 OK 25

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • upholding a search warrant based on an officer’s conclusion that a witness’s description of the images met the definition of child pornography under the state statute
  • computer repairman’s statement that he saw child pornography on computer he was fixing was sufficient to establish probable cause
  • computer repairman’s statement that he saw child pornography on computer he was fixing was sufficient to establish probable cause
  • explicitly distin- guishing between the “great deference” due to the judge who issues a warrant and the non-deferential review of the federal district judge’s decision granting or denying a motion to suppress

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.