Fleetboston Financial Corp. v. Fleetbostonfinancial. Com

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that “the situs language in subparagraph (2)(C) does not enable a plaintiff to bring an in rem action in a forum other than one specified in subpara-graph (2)(A)”
• holding that \the situs language in subparagraph (2)(C) does not enable a plaintiff to bring an in rem action in a forum other than one specified in subparagraph (2)(A)\
• noting that \plaintiff concedes [that a Brazilian resident] has had no apparent contact with the United States (other than registering the domain name) and is said not to be amenable to conventional process in any United States jurisdiction\
• noting that \plaintiff concedes [that a Brazilian resident] has had no apparent contact with the United States (other than registering the domain name) and is said not to be amenable to conventional process in any United States jurisdiction\
• discussing the redundancy problems that would follow if Section 1125(d)(2)(C) were read as to confer in rem jurisdiction
• discussing the redundancy problems that would follow if Section 1125(d)(2)(C) were read as to confer in rem jurisdiction

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).